top of page

🌱 Origin Series #11: FIRPTA – Born from Foreign Fear “What real estate taught the U.S. about foreign money.”

  • Writer: Sandy Saini
    Sandy Saini
  • Aug 14
  • 1 min read

Updated: Aug 21

When most Canadians hear “FIRPTA,” they either go blank— or break into a sweat.

And honestly? Fair.


But behind the long name is a pretty fascinating origin story about real estate, foreign investors, and a wave of American unease in the 1980s.


Let’s rewind. ⏪


🏙️ The 1980s: Real Estate Meets Foreign CapitalIn the late ‘70s and early ‘80s, the U.S. saw a surge of foreign investment in American real estate.


Japanese buyers were especially active, snapping up iconic properties like:

🏢 Rockefeller Center

🏌️ Pebble Beach Golf Links

🏨 Luxury hotels in New York and L.A.


It made headlines— and made lawmakers nervous.


📜 Enter FIRPTA: The Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980

Congress feared that foreign investors could buy U.S. property, sell it at a gain, and walk away without paying U.S. tax.

So they passed FIRPTA.


What it does:

🔒 Treats gain from the sale of U.S. real estate by foreign persons as “effectively connected income”

📉 Triggers a mandatory withholding— usually 15% on gross sale proceeds

📬 Forces the tax to be collected upfront, before the seller disappears into the sunset.


📌 Why this still matters today

If you’re a Canadian investor selling U.S. real estate, FIRPTA definitely applies.

BUT— with proper planning, you may be able to:

✅ Reduce the withholding through IRS Form 8288-B

✅ Recover excess tax with a timely U.S. tax return

✅ Structure the investment smarter up front to manage exposure


🧠 The takeaway?

FIRPTA was born from fear—but it doesn’t have to be scary.


Understand the rules, plan ahead, and work with someone who speaks both languages: tax and cross-border.

Comments


bottom of page