🌱 Origin Series #11: FIRPTA – Born from Foreign Fear “What real estate taught the U.S. about foreign money.”
- Sandy Saini

 - Aug 14
 - 1 min read
 
Updated: Aug 21
When most Canadians hear “FIRPTA,” they either go blank— or break into a sweat.
And honestly? Fair.
But behind the long name is a pretty fascinating origin story about real estate, foreign investors, and a wave of American unease in the 1980s.
Let’s rewind. ⏪
🏙️ The 1980s: Real Estate Meets Foreign CapitalIn the late ‘70s and early ‘80s, the U.S. saw a surge of foreign investment in American real estate.
Japanese buyers were especially active, snapping up iconic properties like:
🏢 Rockefeller Center
🏌️ Pebble Beach Golf Links
🏨 Luxury hotels in New York and L.A.
It made headlines— and made lawmakers nervous.
📜 Enter FIRPTA: The Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980
Congress feared that foreign investors could buy U.S. property, sell it at a gain, and walk away without paying U.S. tax.
So they passed FIRPTA.
What it does:
🔒 Treats gain from the sale of U.S. real estate by foreign persons as “effectively connected income”
📉 Triggers a mandatory withholding— usually 15% on gross sale proceeds
📬 Forces the tax to be collected upfront, before the seller disappears into the sunset.
📌 Why this still matters today
If you’re a Canadian investor selling U.S. real estate, FIRPTA definitely applies.
BUT— with proper planning, you may be able to:
✅ Reduce the withholding through IRS Form 8288-B
✅ Recover excess tax with a timely U.S. tax return
✅ Structure the investment smarter up front to manage exposure
🧠 The takeaway?
FIRPTA was born from fear—but it doesn’t have to be scary.
Understand the rules, plan ahead, and work with someone who speaks both languages: tax and cross-border.




Comments